Situational Judgment — Free Sample

1. A teammate has been delivering work that's 80% complete and 100% missing a critical detail you'd flagged twice. Your manager asks what's going on. The teammate has personal issues that affect their focus. What's the most-effective response?

Describe the work-quality pattern factually with specific examples; acknowledge the personal context without speculating about it; suggest a concrete change (closer pairing, smaller-scope work, a check-in cadence) that would help if the teammate is open to it. Cover for the teammate — describe the work as on track and offer to do a final review pass yourself. Describe the work-quality issues sharply and recommend the teammate be put on a performance improvement plan. Tell the manager you'd rather not get involved; this is between the teammate and the manager directly.

2. Three high-priority tasks land on your plate in the same morning, all marked urgent by different stakeholders. You can finish one well today, two badly, or get partial progress on all three. What's the most-effective approach?

Triage by impact and dependency: identify which task unblocks others or has the highest cost-of-delay, finish that one well, and tell the other stakeholders specifically when you'll get to theirs. Get partial progress on all three so each stakeholder sees you're working on theirs. Pick the task from the highest-seniority stakeholder; the others can wait. Send all three stakeholders the same message asking them to negotiate priority among themselves.

3. A customer is frustrated that a feature you shipped doesn't work the way they expected, even though it works as documented. They escalate to your manager. What's the most-effective response when the manager asks how you'd like to handle it?

Acknowledge the gap between expectation and documentation honestly, propose either a documentation update or a small product change depending on which is more cost-effective, and offer to talk with the customer directly to close the loop. Defend the implementation against the customer's complaint — the feature works as documented, and that's the contract. Apologize and commit to changing the product to match the customer's expectation, regardless of cost. Offer the customer a refund or credit and avoid the documentation conversation entirely.

4. You discover a colleague has been taking credit for a piece of work you led — repeatedly, in front of leadership, in ways that affect promotion-track perceptions. What's the most-effective response?

Have a direct conversation with the colleague first, naming specific instances and the impact; if the pattern continues, document the work attribution clearly in shared artifacts (decision docs, retros, demo recaps) and bring it to your manager with evidence. Escalate to your manager immediately; this is a workplace integrity issue that the manager should handle, not you. Confront the colleague publicly in the next leadership meeting where the misattribution happens. Do nothing and let the work speak for itself; explicit credit-claiming is undignified.

5. Your team is asked to ship a feature on a timeline you believe is too aggressive given the quality bar required. The product manager is pushing for the date; engineering leadership is supportive of pushback. What's the most-effective stance to take?

Articulate the specific quality risks (which dimensions, which user impact) with evidence, propose a smaller scope that could ship on time at the required quality, and let the product manager weigh the trade-off explicitly. Refuse the timeline and tell engineering leadership the date is unrealistic without a scope cut. Agree to the timeline and ship at the lower quality bar; the team can fix it post-launch if needed. Privately work overtime to hit both the timeline and the quality bar; don't surface the conflict.

Your directional indicator

This 5-question sample gives a rough indication only. For a valid, verified Skills Passport credential, take the full 40-question assessment — it takes about 25 minutes.

Take the full 40-scenario SJT assessment for your verified Skills Passport credential.